Harvey vs Clio: Revenue, Efficiency & Valuation

Compare Harvey and Clio on ARR per employee, revenue, headcount, valuation, funding, category rank, and source evidence.

Metric differences

Harvey produces $313K ARR per employee versus $362K for Clio, a directional gap of $49K per employee.

Company	ARR/employee	ARR	Employees	Valuation	Funding
Harvey	$313K	$300M	960	$11B	$200M at $11B co-led by GIC & Sequoia (Mar 2026)
Clio	$362K	$500M	1,380	$5B	$500M Series G (Nov 2025)

Company summaries

Harvey

Harvey is an AI assistant for legal professionals that handles research, drafting, document review, and analysis across litigation, corporate, and regulatory practice areas. The platform is primarily adopted by Am Law 100 and Global 100 law firms seeking to augment attorney productivity on complex legal work. Harvey's models are fine-tuned on legal data and integrated with firm-specific knowledge bases, enabling accurate, context-aware outputs grounded in relevant precedent and statutes. The company has secured partnerships with firms including Allen & Overy and PwC, establishing itself as one of the highest-valued AI legal platforms.

Clio

Clio is a cloud-based legal practice management platform serving law firms of all sizes, from solo practitioners to mid-size firms, covering case management, time tracking, billing, payments, and client intake. The platform has become the operating system for tens of thousands of law firms, with deep integrations across legal research, document management, and accounting tools. Clio has expanded into AI-powered features including document drafting and workflow automation to help attorneys reduce administrative overhead. Its scale and data network across the legal industry give it a unique advantage in building AI features trained on real firm usage patterns.